Resolution Systems InstituteResolution Systems InstituteMenuDonate
  • Home
  • About
    • Overview
    • Mission
    • People
    • History
    • Awards
    • Success Stories
    • Careers
    • Support RSI
  • Our Work
    • Overview
    • Services Offered
    • Program Design
    • Program Administration
    • Research & Evaluation
    • Resource Center
    • Training & Outreach
    • ADR Programs Administered
    • Child Protection Mediation
    • Foreclosure Mediation
  • Resource Center
    • Overview
    • Library Search
    • Court ADR Basics
    • Court ADR Across the US
    • Court ADR Across Illinois
    • Special Topics
    • Model Surveys
    • Peer Review Tools
    • Guide to Program Success
    • Mediation Efficacy Studies
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Donate
Combined ShapeBack to search results

Philadelphia Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Diversion Program: Initial Report of Findings

Goldstein, Ira; Weidig, Colin. Jun. 11, 2001
http://www.trfund.com/resource/downloads/policypubs/Foreclosure_Diversion_Initial_Report.pdf

This study looked at the broad impact that Philadelphia's mortgage foreclosure mediation program is having on the foreclosure process overall, the efficiency of the courts, and the sustainability of agreements that result in homeowners keeping their homes and found that the program is for the most part achieving its goals.

The program is far-reaching, with 60% to 70% of all foreclosures eligible for mediation. Most eligible cases are those that were filed after the beginning of the program (day after cases). Some that were filed as long as four years before the program began were able to petition to participate (day back cases). Of the eligible homeowners, 70% appeared for their session, and of those cases, 33% reached agreement.

The agreements reached were sustainable. Eighty-five percent of the homeowners who reached an agreement that allowed them to stay in their homes were still in their homes 18 months later.

There was a large discrepancy in the percent of cases that proceeded to a Sheriff's sale. While the average was 16% of all participating cases ending with a Sheriff's sale, only 2% of day after cases resulted in a Sheriff's sale, as opposed to 58% of day back cases. The percentage of cases that proceeded to sale dropped after the inception of the program.

The program has not adversely affected the time cases are in the system, and appears not to involve more court appearances. Furthermore, it appears to have improved access to the judicial process, with no discernible difference in participation or agreement rate between income levels or ethnicity.

11 E Adams Street, Suite 500, Chicago, IL 60603

  • 312.922.6475
  • info@aboutrsi.org

Sign up for more information!*

Thank you!

Sorry, a problem occured. Please try again.

  • © 1998-2019 RSI
  • *By signing up for more information you agree to RSI's Disclaimer, Privacy & Copyright policy.
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

To give you the best possible experience, this site uses cookies. If you continue browsing, you accept our use of cookies and agree to our Disclaimer, Privacy & Copyright policy.

Learn More